JihadTracker – 1:005 – Discerning Islam

Read Time:44 Minute, 46 Second

ISI/DI: Nearly two weeks ago, on Sunday, August 17, 2025 — I was listening to Mark Levin, and he said something that you would think is just common sense, yet, it is very evident no one, or at least very few, do this. That is to LISTEN to what our adversaries were saying.

This issue will try and do just that, listen to our adversaries, primarily, Vladimir Putin, president of Russia; Kim Jung Un, president of North Korea; XI Jinping, president of China; and, Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei.

RUSSIA’S PRESIDENT: VLADIMIR PUTIN

What is Vladimir Putin Saying About America?

On US Dominance And Foreign Policy

Putin’s statements regarding the United States often reflect a complex and sometimes critical perspective, particularly on its foreign policy, while also acknowledging the need for dialogue and areas of potential cooperation.

Critique Of Sanctions: Putin has criticized the U.S. for imposing sanctions, viewing them as undermining trust in the dollar as the global currency and as a typical mistake of an “empire” that overestimates its power.
Declining Hegemony: He has frequently stated his belief that the United States’ global dominance is ending and that the world is moving toward a more balanced, multi-polar order. He sees Russia as a leader in this new order, alongside rising powers like China and the BRICS nations (Brazil, India, and China).
Interventionism And “Monopoly”: Putin has criticized U.S. military interventions, especially in the Middle East, attributing them to a dangerous American monopoly on world power. He believes the end of this “unipolar world” will lead to greater international dialogue.
Double Standards And Broken Promises: He has accused the West, including the U.S., of double standards and failing to honor agreements, citing examples like NATO expansion and a perceived lack of sincerity in security commitments, according to a YouTube video.

On Cooperation And Relations

Desire for Dialogue: Despite his criticisms, Putin emphasizes the importance of dialogue and improving relations with the U.S. He has suggested a readiness to improve relations at any time.
Ukraine Conflict: Following a recent summit with President Trump in Alaska, Putin expressed hope that agreements reached could be a starting point for resolving the Ukraine issue and normalizing US-Russia relations, according to CBS News.

On Specific Issues

Traditional Values: Putin believes that many people in Western countries, including the U.S., share Russia’s position on traditional values and that Russia’s stance on family, gender, and cultural issues resonates with them.
Election Interference: In an interview with Megyn Kelly, when asked about alleged Russian interference in the U.S. election, Putin reportedly said, “So what?” and claimed ignorance about the motives of Russian nationals involved.

It’s important to note that Putin’s statements and perspectives are often shaped by Russia’s strategic interests and its geopolitical competition with the United States. His words are not always universally accepted or without controversy.

What is he saying about Ukraine and other nations close by? He is saying, “I want to restore the Soviet Union.”

Various interpretations exist regarding Vladimir Putin’s statements about restoring Russia’s historical influence and territorial integrity.

Statements And Interpretations

Focus On “Historical Unity: Putin’s 2021 essay “On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians” argued that Russians and Ukrainians are “one people” and questioned Ukraine’s statehood, a precursor to and defense of Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. He has also stated that “Ukraine has never had its own authentic statehood” and that it is “an integral part of our own history, culture, spiritual space.”
Imperial Ambitions: Some analysts interpret Putin’s actions and rhetoric as a desire to restore the Russian empire, according to the Atlantic Council. The seizure of Crimea in 2014 and the ongoing war in Ukraine are seen by some as part of this effort.
Comparison To Historical Figures: Putin has drawn parallels between his own actions and those of historical figures like Peter the Great, claiming he is “taking back” historically Russian lands, according to Al Jezeera.

Denials Of Imperial Goals: While engaging in actions that are perceived by many as imperialistic, Putin has denied planning to restore the Russian Empire, according The Moscow Times. He has stated that Russia “recognized the new geopolitical realities” after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

It is important to note that the interpretation of Putin’s statements and actions is a complex and highly debated topic.

Analysis:

In recent statements, Vladimir Putin has emphasized the view that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a “major geopolitical catastrophe.”

This remark, made in a 2005 address and frequently cited by analysts, has led to discussions about his possible intention to restore the Soviet Union or the earlier Tsarist Russian empire.

However, while some interpret Putin’s actions as aiming to re-establish the former Soviet Union or Russia’s historical empire, he has also stated that “Anyone who wants it restored has no brains,” according to Oxford Reference. In September 2022, Putin denied seeking to revive the Soviet Union, reported by Reuters.

Alternate Views

Some analysts and officials, like President Biden, believe Putin’s ambitions extend to re-establishing the Soviet Union, viewing the war in Ukraine as part of this goal. Others argue that Putin is not aiming to literally recreate the USSR but rather to rebuild Russian power and influence, including regaining control over former Soviet states and challenging Western expansion, says the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Points To Consider

Ambiguity And Interpretation: Putin’s pronouncements and actions can be interpreted in different ways, leading to ongoing debate among experts.
Reclaiming Influence: Even if not a direct restoration99 of the USSR, it’s clear that Putin seeks to strengthen Russia’s position as a global power and reassert influence in areas it considers its sphere of interest.
Shift Towards A “Russian World”: Putin’s statements also emphasize a concept of a “Russian world” which extends beyond the borders of the current Russian Federation, encompassing historically and culturally connected areas, says the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Ultimately, Putin’s true intentions remain a subject of debate and analysis. While he has publicly dismissed a direct re-creation of the Soviet Union, his actions and rhetoric consistently reflect a desire to restore Russia’s global standing and influence, particularly in its neighboring regions.

What Does Putin Think About the End Times?

Vladimir Putin does not express views on a religious “end times” but has made pragmatic remarks about the eventual, inevitable end of the sun, stating it’s “unavoidable” and not something to fear. He also issued a warning that the world is “close to the point of no return” in June 2024, but this was a geopolitical warning about current events, not a theological statement about the end of times.

Putin’s Views on the Sun’s End

In 2012, Putin was asked if he was afraid of the end of the world and responded that it was “unavoidable.”

He based this comment on scientific understanding of the sun’s lifespan, explaining that it has billions of years left before it eventually dies as a white dwarf star.

More recently, in June 2024, Putin issued a warning that the world is “close to the point of no return”.
However, this was a geopolitical statement, not a religious prophecy about the end times, and was likely related to global conflicts and tensions.

NORTH KOREA’S PRESIDENT: KIM JONG UN

What is Kim Jung Un Saying About America?

Recent statements by a North Korean leader Kim Jong Un regarding the United States have focused on condemning joint US-South Korea military exercises and emphasizing the need for North Korea to strengthen its nuclear capitalism.

In Kim Jong Un’s Own Words

That North Korea needs to rapidly expand its nuclear armament in light of the current security environment, which he claims is becoming increasingly serious.
That US-South Korea military exercises are a “clear expression of their intention to remain most hostile and confrontational” to North Korea and an “obvious expression of their will to provoke war.”
He believes these drills have become more provocative by incorporating a “nuclear element,” requiring North Korea to respond with “proactive and overwhelming countermeasures.”
These statements came as the US and South Korea began their annual large-scale summertime military exercise, Ulchi Freedom Shield, designed to enhance their readiness against North Korean threats. Kim Jong Un has long denounced these drills as invasion rehearsals.

In response to recent US-South Korea military exercises, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has condemned the drills and called for a rapid expansion of his country’s nuclear arsenal.

According to State Media, Kim Ciewed the Exercises As:

“An obvious expression of their will to provoke war.”
Demonstrating the intent by the US and South Korea to “remain most hostile and confrontational” towards North Korea.
Incorporating a “nuclear element” that needs “proactive and overwhelming” countermeasures from Pyongyang.

Kim made these statements during a visit to a navy destroyer being fitted with nuclear-capable systems. This coincides with the launch of the annual large-scale Ulchi Freedom Shield exercises, which involve computer-simulated command post operations and field training, according to PBS.

There’s More

Kim has consistently rejected calls from Washington and Seoul to resume negotiations aimed at denuclearization.
North Korea has long viewed these joint drills as rehearsals for invasion, often using them to justify its own military displays and nuclear weapons program development.
Relations between the Koreas and with the US remain tense, despite South Korean attempts to improve ties.
North Korea has also deepened its military cooperation with Russia following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Here are some of Kim Jong Un’s recent statements and pronouncements, based on reporting from state media and analysis of his public activities:

Strengthening Ties Wiith Russia And Support For Russia’s War In Ukraine: Kim Jong Un sent a letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin emphasizing the “unprecedented alliance” and “blood-forged solidarity” between North Korea and Russia. He expressed appreciation for Russia’s actions in Ukraine, specifically in the Kursk region, and referred to a “common struggle” against perceived threats like “neo-Nazism” to uphold international justice and oppose hegemony.
Reaffirming Alignment With Russia: Kim discussed deepening ties with Putin in a phone call ahead of Putin’s meeting with US President Donald Trump, according to North Korean and Russian state media. North Korea has been sending troops and military aid to Russia in support of the war in Ukraine. Kim also attended events marking the anniversary of Korea’s liberation from Japanese colonial rule, where he praised the ties between North Korea and Russia.
Dismissing South Korea’s Peace Overtures And US Negotiations: North Korea, through statements attributed to Kim Yo Jong, Kim Jong Un’s sister, dismissed South Korea’s recent peace overtures as a “pipe-dream” and reiterated no interest in dialogue with the South. She also dismissed the possibility of renewed negotiations with the US, citing upcoming joint military exercises between the US and South Korea as proof of their continued hostility. Kim Jong Un himself has reportedly stated there is no will to improve relations with the South and that this position will be enshrined in North Korea’s constitution.

Disputes Over Border Propaganda: Kim Yo Jong denied South Korean claims that North Korea is removing loudspeakers along the inter-Korean border, stating they have no intention of doing so. This came after South Korea had removed its own border loudspeakers as a gesture to ease tensions.

Focusing On Domestic Issues: Kim Jong Un has reportedly ordered workplace safety reforms after a serious accident at a steel mill and visited the Korean War Veterans Cemetery. He has also been involved in inspecting a newly-founded military factory developing rockets.

Cultivating a Potential Successor: Recent reports suggest that Kim Jong Un is elevating his daughter, Kim Ju-ae, with increased state media coverage and appearances in military settings, possibly grooming her as a successor, according to The New York Times.

Overall, Kim Jong Un’s recent statements and actions indicate a strong focus on bolstering ties with Russia, dismissing dialogue with South Korea and the United States, and potentially preparing for a future leadership transition within North Korea.

Analysis

Based on recent statements attributed to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, as well as official North Korean media reports:

Stronger Alliance With Russia: Kim has emphasized the deepening ties between North Korea and Russia, referring to them as an “unprecedented alliance” and highlighting their cooperation in efforts related to the war in Ukraine. He also sent a letter to President Putin stating that the bilateral ties have reached “full bloom” and will strengthen further in the future.
No Interest In Dialogue With The US: North Korean statements, including those from Kim’s sister Kim Yo Jong, have consistently dismissed any possibility of renewed talks with the US, labeling such reports as “false suppositions”.
Rejection Of South Korean Outreach: North Korea has also rejected South Korean President Lee Jae Myung’s attempts to engage Pyongyang and ease tensions, calling them a pipe-dream,” according to Reuters.
Condemnation Of Joint US-South Korean Military Exercises: North Korea continues to denounce these exercises, viewing them as rehearsals for an invasion, says UPI.
Denial Of Loudspeaker Removal At The Border: Kim Yo Jong has also explicitly denied claims that North Korea removed propaganda loudspeakers from the border with South Korea.
Workplace Safety Reforms: Following an accident at a steel mill, Kim Jong Un reportedly ordered a comprehensive review of workplace safety measures and labor practices, according to Daily NK.
Tribute To North Korean Soldiers Killed In Ukraine: Kim Jong Un was reportedly seen weeping at the casket of North Korean soldiers killed fighting in Ukraine, a scene broadcast by state media, says Fox News.

Important Note: Information about North Korea is often presented through state media outlets, which may not always reflect a complete or unbiased picture of events or sentiments within the country. External analysis and reporting can provide additional perspectives but should also be considered critically.

Kim Jong Un’s views on the “end times” in the traditional religious sense of a final judgment or a catastrophic conclusion to the world are not explicitly known through public statements or official North Korean pronouncements

Instead North Korea’s ideology of Juche and its focus on the country’s self-reliance, the strength of its leadership, and its military capabilities overshadow any official expression of religious or apocalyptic beliefs.

It is important to understand the context of North Korean society, where:

The Kim family has historically been treated with reverence, and the state ideology revolves around the Kims as the central figures guiding the nation, rather than a religious deity in the traditional sense.
North Korean state media and official statements often focus on portraying the country as facing external threats, particularly from the US and South Korea, and emphasize the importance of military preparedness and strengthening their nuclear arsenal as a deterrent against these perceived threats.
While North Korean propaganda may at times use strong, even apocalyptic-sounding language in its critiques of its adversaries, it’s generally understood to be a strategic communication tool aimed at projecting an image of strength and deterring potential threats.

Therefore, Kim Jong Un’s public statements and actions focus on the perceived external threats to North Korea, and the country’s need for a strong military and nuclear program to ensure its survival, rather than on traditional end-times beliefs.

Based on available information, Kim Jong Un’s views on the “end times” likely stem from the Juche ideology, North Korea’s state-sponsored belief system. Juche emphasizes self-reliance, autonomy, and the central role of the leader in guiding the nation’s destiny.

Instead of a traditional religious or apocalyptic understanding of the end times, Kim’s pronouncements often emphasize:

The threat of war and the need for preparedness: This includes warnings against perceived threats from the US and its allies, coupled with calls for strengthening North Korea’s nuclear arsenal as a deterrent and a means for preemptive strikes.
Economic self-sufficiency and the overcoming of hardship: Kim stresses the need for North Korea to rely on its own resources and to endure challenging conditions, highlighting efforts to boost self-sufficiency in various sectors.

In essence, Kim’s ideology presents a future where North Korea, under his leadership, will overcome adversity and secure its independence, according to a 2018 Vox article. This vision appears to be focused on the nation’s survival and success in the face of external pressure, rather than on a traditional religious narrative of the end of the world.

What Does Kim Think About the End Times?

As the leader of an officially atheist state with a personality cult, Kim Jong Un does not subscribe to a traditional concept of “the end times.” Instead, his view of the future is shaped by the state ideology of Juche and his regime’s priorities. He frames any potential conflict or crisis in political and military terms, not religious ones.

No Religious End Times

Atheist state: North Korea is an officially atheist country where religious activity is severely suppressed.
Theocratic-Style Cult: In place of traditional religion, the state promotes the Juche ideology, a political philosophy that functions as a a personality cult. Kim Jong Un, like his father and grandfather, is elevated to a near-divine status and presented as the master of the country’s destiny.
Rejection of Outside Beliefs: The regime actively teaches against “superstitious practices” and suppresses religions like Christianity, seeing them as a challenge to the cult of personality. For citizens, the end of the world is not a biblical apocalypse but a disaster that could befall the nation due to its enemies or the failure of the “divine” leadership.

Political and Military View of the Future

Kim Jong Un’s public statements on the future do not describe a religious apocalypse. Instead, he discusses the country’s fate in the context of geopolitical tensions and its ongoing standoff with its enemies, particularly the United States and South Korea.

Threats of Nuclear War: North Korea has repeatedly threatened nuclear war, framing it as a potential outcome of conflict with the “American imperialists.” Kim and his sister, Kim Yo Jong, have portrayed North Korea’s nuclear arsenal as a necessary “war deterrent” that protects the country.
Nuclear Deterrence: In 2020, Kim claimed that North Korea’s nuclear weapons meant there would be “no more war on this earth,” framing the arsenal not as an apocalyptic weapon but as a guarantor of peace and security for his country.
Hostility Toward South Korea: In 2023, Kim Jong Un announced a dramatic shift, abandoning reunification as a goal and designating South Korea as a “principal enemy”. This reframes the future of the Korean Peninsula as a permanent two-state situation, not an eventual reunification.
Warnings of Hard Times: On multiple occasions, Kim has warned his people to prepare for hard times and struggle, particularly during periods of economic hardship exacerbated by international sanctions and the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Juche-Driven Future

The official North Korean view of the future is that of a powerful, self-reliant, and socialist state achieved through the guidance of its “great leader.” The end goal is national prosperity and the preservation of the Kim dynasty, not a spiritual event. In the worldview promoted by the regime, the “end” is either a victory over its enemies or the ultimate failure of its leadership — which is an unthinkable outcome for its citizens.

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s views on the end times are not based on religious or eschatological prophecies, but on the political ideology of Juche. This state-enforced ideology replaces traditional religious beliefs with a deification of the ruling Kim family, which portrays the leader as a godlike figure who holds the destiny of the nation in his own hands.

Therefore, North Korea does not have a traditional concept of the “end times,” but rather a political narrative that frames its conflict with the outside world in quasi-religious terms. The regime’s rhetoric focuses on:

Self-Reliance: The Juche ideology promotes total national independence and self-sufficiency, framing engagement with the outside world as a path to subjugation.
The Kim Family as Divine Protectors: The Kim family is worshipped as a divine entity. This belief system asserts that the supreme leader protects the nation from its enemies, primarily the U.S.
A Nuclear Deterrent for Survival: Kim Jong Un has stated that North Korea’s nuclear weapons guarantee that there will be “no more war on this earth,” framing the nuclear arsenal as a guarantor of the nation’s—not humanity’s—survival.
Conflating Foreign Powers With Existential Threats: The regime portrays foreign nations, particularly the United States, as malevolent and imperialistic forces that threaten the destruction of North Korea and its people.

The official narrative suggests that as long as the people remain loyal to the ruling Kim family, they can overcome any challenge, including threats from the outside world. This view is used to justify the regime’s actions and maintain total control over its population.

CHINA’S PRESIDENT: XI JINPING

What is Jinping Saying About America?

Xi Jinping is a Chinese politician who has been the paramount leader of China since 2012.

President Xi Jinping of China has conveyed a complex and evolving perspective on the United States, marked by a mix of cautious optimism and sharp criticism.

Xi’s Sentiments About the U.S.

Taiwan as a “Red Line”: Xi considers the issue of Taiwan as crucial and sensitive, urging the U.S. to handle it with prudence to avoid escalating tensions and potential conflict, according to CNN. He views Taiwan as China’s territory and has vowed “reunification.”
Concerns about “Containment and Suppression”: Xi has expressed frustration with what he perceives as U.S. attempts to isolate and impede China’s development through policies of “containment, encirclement and suppression”. He asserts that this U.S.-led campaign poses “unprecedented, severe challenges” to China, according to PBS.
Emphasizing China’s Resilience: Xi has stated that such “suppression and containment will only strengthen the will and boost the morale of the Chinese people”. He has also highlighted China’s economic resilience, positioning it as a significant driver of global economic recovery.
Dialogue and Cooperation are Necessary: Xi believes that cooperation and dialogue are the “only right choice” for navigating China-U.S. relations, which he describes as a “giant ship” that requires careful steering away from disturbances and disruptions.
Rejection of “Hegemony and Power Politics”: Xi frequently criticizes “hegemonism and power politics,” which he suggests are detrimental to global peace and stability, in what is widely interpreted as a veiled reference to the U.S.
Potential for a “Brighter Future”: Despite the criticisms and challenges, Xi acknowledges the possibility of a “brighter future” for the relationship and has indicated China’s openness to being a partner and frien, according to CNBC.
Seeking a Multipolar World Order: Xi advocates for a global governance system that promotes “fairness and justice.”

In essence, Xi Jinping’s discourse surrounding the U.S. reflects a desire for a more balanced and cooperative relationship, while simultaneously asserting China’s interests and challenging the U.S.-centric global order. He has shifted between direct accusations of hostility and overtures for dialogue, depending on the specific context and audience.

Chinese President Xi Jinping’s recent statements about the US reflect a complex and evolving relationship characterized by both cooperation and competition, particularly around trade and technology

Recent Statements on the US

Calls for Cooperation: Xi has reiterated the need for dialogue and cooperation with the United States as the only right choice for navigating the complexities of their relationship. He emphasized the need to manage their relationship to avoid disturbances and strengthen cooperation in various fields like foreign affairs, economy, and military affairs.
Criticism of US policies: Xi has also implicitly and sometimes explicitly criticized US policies and actions. For instance, he warned against “bullying and tyranny” shortly after a trade truce between the two nations, perceived by some as a direct reference to US trade tactics. He also reportedly warned that “the world can move forward without America,” referencing historical examples of declining empires. Chinese state media and officials have also urged the US to handle the Taiwan question with prudence, adhering to the one-China principle and avoiding actions that could lead to confrontation or conflict. China views Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed reunification, if necessary by force.
Vision of Waning US Influence: Xi is actively promoting his vision of a world with waning US influence and a more multipolar order, seeking stronger relationships with countries in Latin America and Europe, positioning China as a more reliable partner.

Context

These statements come amidst escalating tensions between the two powers. The US has recently imposed high tariffs on Chinese exports, and China has responded with countermeasures, although both sides have also agreed to temporary truces and continue to engage in dialogue. The relationship remains complex, with both cooperation and rivalry playing significant roles.

Key Positions and Background:

Current Roles: General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC), and President of the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
Assumed Office: He became General Secretary of the CCP and Chairman of the CMC in 2012, and President in 2013.
Family Background: Son of Xi Zhongxun, a former Vice Premier and Communist Party hero. He is married to Peng Liyuan and has a daughter, Xi Mingze.
Education: Holds a degree in Marxist theory and ideological education and studied chemical engineering at Tsinghua University, later obtaining a post-graduate law degree from the same university.
Career Path: Started as a personal secretary to the Minister of Defense, Geng Biao, and then rose through various positions in Hebei, Fujian, Zhejiang, and Shanghai before assuming his current roles.
Recent Events:
- Secured an unprecedented third term as president in March 2023.
- Has been actively engaged in foreign policy and has recently held phone calls with the Presidents of Brazil and Russia, exchanged messages with the President of Nepal, and accepted credentials from new foreign ambassadors.
- Signed an order to commend military units and individuals.
- Met with tech entrepreneurs, indicating a shift in approach following a crackdown on the tech sector, to encourage innovation and achieve China’s tech self-sufficiency goals.
Key Initiatives/Policies:
- Anti-Corruption Campaign: Launched a major anti-corruption campaign in 2012, disciplining a large number of officials.
- Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): Launched the BRI in 2013, a significant infrastructure project to expand China’s trade links and global influence.
- Focus on Environmental Protection: Made environmental protection a priority and punished officials and companies for pollution.
- Military Modernization: Overseeing a significant modernization of the People’s Liberation Army to enhance its combat readiness.
- Emphasis on Self-Reliance and Technology: Focused on making China more self-sufficient in key areas and investing heavily in scientific research and technology.

Note: Some analysts point to Xi Jinping’s consolidation of power, including the removal of presidential term limits, as a key characteristic of his leadership. Other analyses suggest a shift in his political style and the delegation of some tasks to other officials, which some describe as a “second-line” strategy, though he maintains overall control.

Reports on Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party do not indicate he believes in the religious concept of “end times” in the traditional sense Instead, his ideology, “Xi Jinping Thought,” is steeped in Marxist atheism andemphasizes a historical worldview focused on China’s rise and rejuvenation, rather than a spiritual apocalypse. He sees the world as undergoing a profound transformation, with the international system evolving away from one dominated by the US, towards one with China at its center. In Xi’s view, the “real end of history” will be the decline of capitalism and the emergence of China as the leading global power.

This vision involves Reshaping the international order: Building a “shared future for mankind” and addressing perceived imbalances in the current system.

While the CCP promotes atheism, they have also implemented policies of “religious Sinicization” aimed at aligning religion with the Party’s political agenda and Marxist vision. This means integrating CCP ideology and supporting the Party’s leadership within all facets of religious life, according to USCIRF. Religious freedom in China is subject to significant restrictions and oversight by the state.

What Does Jinping Think About the End Times?

President Xi Jinping’s views on “the end times” are not necessarily framed in a religious, apocalyptic sense. Instead, his focus revolves around the “grea “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation” and the establishment of China as a dominant global power, accruing to the New York Times. This vision implies a historical trajectory, with China rising and the current international system, which he perceives as unfair, giving way to a new order with China at its center.

More Specifically:

A “New Era” and Global Leadership: Xi envisions a “new era” for China, characterized by its increased wealth, power, and status on the global stage. He believes that China’s development will influence the future of the nation, world socialism, and global politics.
Marxism-Leninism and the End of History: Within the Chinese system, Marxist-Leninist ideology views the United States as facing capitalist decline, ultimately leading to a “real end of history” where China emerges as the dominant force.
Preparing for “Struggle”: Xi has urged the Chinese people to prepare for “struggle” to achieve China’s goals, suggesting a world view shaped by a sense of national mission.

In essence, Xi’s “end times” perspective appears to be anchored in a belief in China’s eventual rise to global preeminence and the transformation of the international order under its leadership, informed by Marxist-Leninist ideology ……… no matter how misguided it may be.

As an officially atheist, Marxist, and the leader of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Xi Jinping does not endorse the concept of a religious or spiritual “end times.” Instead, his worldview is shaped by the Marxist-Leninist belief in a historical progression toward a communist society and his own nationalist vision of China’s “great rejuvenation.”

Marxist and Atheist Foundation

Rejection of religion: In keeping with Marxist doctrine, the CCP views religion as a temporary historical phenomenon that will eventually disappear. While the CCP’s policies toward religion have evolved over time, the ultimate goal remains the “suppression of religion”.
“Unyielding Marxist atheism”: As a CCP member, Xi is required to be an “unyielding Marxist atheist.” The party promotes atheism in public life and forbids its members from joining any religion. This stance is antithetical to any belief in a religious apocalypse.
Secular apocalypse: Marxism itself can be seen as a secular version of an apocalyptic narrative. It posits a universal, progressive history leading to a final culmination: a utopian communist state. From this perspective, the “end of history” is not divine but a political and economic climax driven by class struggle.

The “Chinese Dream” and Historical Destiny

National rejuvenation: Xi’s vision is defined by the “Chinese Dream,” which seeks to restore China to its ancient prominence and glory. Rather than anticipating a spiritual end time, this ideology focuses on a state-directed, earthly goal of national ascendancy.
“Change unseen for a 100 years”: Xi’s remarks about “changes unseen for a 100 years” refer to the reshaping of the global order, not an eschatological event. He portrays his agenda as advancing the forces of history against a declining Western-led system.
Historical determinism: This view frames China’s rise as a historically inevitable outcome, portraying its actions as being on the “right side of history” and the United States as destined for capitalist decline.

The CCP’s Co-Option of Religious Concepts

The CCP’s strategy is not simply to eradicate religion but to subordinate it to its own political agenda through a policy called “Sinicization,” or “Chinafication.”

Political domestication: Under Xi, the CCP has intensified its efforts to control all religious activity, altering doctrines and installing loyalist leaders to ensure submission to the party.
Rewriting scriptures: The party has launched a project to rewrite religious texts, including the Bible, to align them with socialist values. In one example, the biblical story of Jesus and the adulteress was reportedly altered to show Jesus stone the woman himself, reflecting the party’s emphasis on state power over compassion.
Control over prophecy: This effort seeks to eliminate any spiritual end-times narratives in favor of the CCP’s own secular vision of history. It is a tool for ensuring the stability of party rule, not an embrace of religious belief.

As an unyielding Marxist atheist, Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) he leads do not subscribe to a religious concept of the “end times.” Their worldview is based on historical materialism, which views history as a series of class struggles, not a divinely ordained or cataclysmic apocalypse.

For Xi Jinping, the “end” of the current global order is a historical inevitability, not a supernatural event. He has spoken of “changes unseen in a hundred years” as a turning point where the U.S.-led system will be replaced by a new international order led by China.

The Marxist-Atheist Worldview

The CCP’s official position, which Xi Jinping regularly affirms, regards religious beliefs as a temporary historical phenomenon that will eventually disappear as societies and science advance.

Religion as an Obstacle: The CCP views religious beliefs, particularly those with a foreign connection like Christianity, as a potential ideological threat to its authority and a distraction from its political goals.
The “end” of Religion: From a Marxist perspective, the “end times” for religion will occur when the Communist Party succeeds in its mission to achieve a highly developed material and spiritual civilization. In this view, people will no longer need religion, as their social life will be under conscious, planned control.

The Political Vision of a New World Order

Rather than dwelling on a religious end of the world, Xi Jinping and the CCP focus on a political and historical “end” of Western dominance.

A historical dialectic: The CCP believes that historical materialism, a core Marxist concept, guarantees China’s eventual rise and the decline of the capitalist West.
“Great changes unseen in a century”: This often-repeated phrase from Xi refers to the tectonic geopolitical shifts that are altering the balance of global power, presenting an opportunity for China to take a dominant role.
Clash of ideologies: Xi perceives a long-term ideological struggle against the U.S. and its allies. He has called for party members to remain loyal and “unyielding Marxist atheists” while working to reshape the global order.

Persecution of Religious Groups

The CCP’s atheism and its political paranoia have led to a severe crackdown on religious groups, especially those perceived as challenging the party’s control.

“Religious affairs” with Chinese characteristics: Xi’s policy is to “Sinicize” all religions, forcing them to conform to the CCP’s ideology and state control.
Suppression of dissent: The party actively works to prevent religions from receiving foreign support or from serving as a rallying point for dissent.
Crackdowns and censorship: The government censors religious content online, demolishes places of worship, and arrests and imprisons religious leaders and members. The treatment of Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang, involving mass surveillance, detentions, and forced assimilation, exemplifies the CCP’s suppression of religious identity.

IRAN’S SUPREME LEADER: ALI KHAMENEI

What is Khamenei Saying About America?

Ali Khamenei is the Supreme Leader of Iran. He is a religious and political leader based in Iran.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s exact location is unknown, but reports suggest he has been sheltering in a secure bunker, possibly in Lavizan, Tehran, according to Iran International.

Based on recent reports and speeches, here’s a summary of what Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has been saying about the United States:

Defiance and resistance: Khamenei has consistently emphasized that Iran will “never surrender” to the U.S. and will continue to resist what he views as hostile American policies.
Criticism of U.S. policies and actions:
- He has accused the U.S. of hypocrisy, especially on human rights, referencing events like the French police actions in Paris according to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.
- Khamenei has criticized the U.S. for its actions in the region, particularly its involvement in the recent conflict, accusing it of intervening to “save” Israel from being “utterly destroyed” by Iranian attacks, according to PBS.
- He has dismissed President Trump’s statements regarding the effectiveness of U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities as “showmanship” and exaggerations, according to YouTube.
Warning against military intervention: Khamenei has explicitly warned the U.S. that any military involvement would result in “irreparable damage” for the Americans, suggesting potential retaliation against U.S. bases in the Middle East.
Downplaying U.S. achievements: He has stated that the U.S. achieved “no gains” and that the Iranian regime was ultimately victorious in the recent conflict, despite acknowledging some damage to Iranian facilities.
“Death to America” slogan: Khamenei has reiterated that the “Death to America” slogan is directed at U.S. leaders and their policies, not the American people.
Skepticism towards negotiations: Khamenei has expressed skepticism about engaging in negotiations with the U.S., citing past experiences where he feels the U.S. did not uphold its agreements, according to AP News. However, there have been some indications that the Iranian regime might be open to resuming nuclear talks, seeing them as essential for their survival.

Important Note: It’s important to consider that Khamenei’s statements often cater to a domestic audience and may not fully reflect the complexities and internal debates within the Iranian government regarding U.S. relations, according to Reuters.

He has not appeared publicly since June 13, 2025, the same day as Israel’s military strike on Iranian territory. His last known public appearance was a meeting with members of parliament on June 11, 2025, according to YouTube. Some sources, like The bNew York Times, speculate he is avoiding electronic communication to prevent assassination attempts. His prolonged absence and silence have sparked concern among Iranians.

Ali Khamenei’s location is a secret due to ongoing regional tensions and concerns about his personal safety, especially following recent clashes between Iran and Israel

Reports in June and July 2025 indicated that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s exact location was unclear following Israeli military action against Iran

. There were suggestions that he was in a secure bunker, possibly in Lavizan, Tehran, and that he may have been avoiding electronic communication for security reasons.

There were suggestions that he was in a secure bunker, possibly in Lavizan, Tehran, and that he may have been avoiding electronic communication for security reasons.

More recently, however, Ayatollah Khamenei made a public appearance in Tehran for the Eid al-Fitr prayer ceremony, where he reiterated Iran’s intention to retaliate against Israel. He has also been reported to have warned the U.S. against further attacks on Iran, indicating that his public engagement has resumed following a period of heightened security concerns and reduced visibility.

Key Reasons

Assassination threats: Khamenei’s prolonged absence and reports of him residing in a secure bunker suggest fears of potential assassination attempts, possibly from Israel.
Heightened security measures: To prevent tracking and potential attacks, Khamenei is reportedly avoiding electronic communication while sheltering in the bunker.
Recent military conflicts: Khamenei’s disappearance followed Israeli strikes on Iranian territory, further intensifying concerns about his security during a period of open conflict.

While some reports suggest Khamenei has taken shelter in an underground bunker in Lavizan, Tehran, his precise location remains officially undisclosed and has been the subject of considerable speculation.

Recent events suggest that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has been facing threats from multiple sources.

Specific Groups and Recent Threats

Israel: Israeli officials, including Defense Minister Israel Katz, have openly discussed targeting Khamenei during the recent conflict between Iran and Israel. While Israel has denied currently pursuing his life following a ceasefire, the threat remains in the background.
United States: U.S. President Donald Trump also appeared to threaten Khamenei during the conflict, stating he knew where Khamenei was hiding, though he later clarified that regime change was not a current U.S. objective. An Iranian envoy has since protested these U.S. and Israeli threats to the UN.
Iranian Reformists: Khamenei’s official website has suggested that recent statements by reformists were similar to a U.S. and Israeli “influence campaign” aimed at promoting division within Iran, particularly regarding nuclear policy and engagement with the West. This highlights an internal challenge to Khamenei’s authority.
Axis of Resistance (proxies): While seemingly aligned with Iran, the “Axis of Resistance” – a loose coalition of Iranian-backed groups – has been significantly weakened by Israeli attacks, according to Reuters. Some believe this weakening could pose a long-term threat to Khamenei’s regional influence and stability within Iran, potentially leading to desperate acts.

Potential Internal Threats

The post-war environment seems to have deepened fissures within Iran between hardliners and reformists, who disagree on how to govern and engage with the West. Khamenei’s rhetoric emphasizing external threats may be a way to deflect from the deep internal unrest within the country, says The Washington Institute. The possibility of activating the “snapback mechanism” in the nuclear deal is seen by some as an existential threat to the regime, potentially leading to further protests and instability. Additionally, the controversy surrounding the Zangezur Corridor has exposed internal divisions and power struggles within the regime, which could increase. its fragility, according to Caliber, Az.

Hardliners vs. Reformers

Reformists: Advocate for increased engagement with the West, economic liberalization, and greater social and political freedoms within Iran. They believe some level of engagement with the West is necessary for Iran to achieve its national interests. The recent conflict with Israel has intensified debate among reformists about the need for fundamental shifts in domestic and foreign policy, including curbing the influence of the Revolutionary Guard Corps and reconsidering nuclear policy. However, the hardliners continue to marginalize them, says The Washington Institute.
Hardliners: Favor a more isolationist approach, emphasize the revolutionary ideals of the Islamic Republic, and maintain a hostile stance towards the West, particularly the United States and Israel. They have gained considerable ground in recent years, especially with the 2021 election of President Ebrahim Raisi, who has since died. Hardline media and officials view the recent war as a validation of their stance against the West.

Impact of Recent Events

Strategic Assessment: The conflict with Israel has triggered a reassessment of Iran’s geopolitical strategy within the country, highlighting the costs of its existing regional approach. While some, like Ali Vaez, argue that the conflict may incentivize Iran to pursue nuclear weapons, others see it as a moment for internal reevaluation.
Nuclear Deal: The looming October deadline for the expiration or extension of UN Security Council Resolution 2231, which deals with the nuclear deal, has intensified internal debate about the snapback mechanism. Hardliners reject any “zero enrichment” demands, while reformists are pushing for diplomatic solutions.
Zangezur Corridor: The US-brokered peace deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan and the US control of the Zangezur corridor have been met with strong opposition from some within Iran, particularly hardliners, who see it as a strategic encirclement and a threat to Iran’s regional influence and access to Europe. This has ignited debate within Iran about how to respond to this challenge, says The Jerusalem Post.

Supreme Leader’s Role

Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei plays a crucial role in these internal power struggles. He has the final say on major domestic and foreign policy decisions and wields significant control over key institutions. He has used his influence to favor hardliners and suppress dissenting voices, according to The New York Times. His rhetoric, which focuses on external threats, may also be an attempt to deflect attention from internal unrest and protests.

Future Outlook

The future direction of Iran is unclear. The post-war environment seems to have emboldened both sides. While hardliners appear to be firmly in control, reformists believe the wartime unity has created an opportunity for change, according to IranWire. The upcoming months, particularly leading up to the October deadline, are likely to be critical in shaping the internal political landscape of Iran.

After years of marginalization by hardliners, reformists in Iran have recently intensified their calls for significant changes in both domestic and foreign policy, particularly in the wake of the recent conflict with Israel and the US’s involvement in the Zangezur Corridor.

Domestic Policy Demands

Reformists advocate for political reforms including lifting restrictions on leaders like Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Zahra Rahnavard, holding free elections, ending censorship, reducing the influence of security forces, and potentially a constitutional referendum. Socially, they seek to reform women’s rights laws, address the concerns of student activists and the labor movement, and tackle environmental issues. Economically, their demands include removing the economy from the control of oligarchs, promoting equal economic opportunities, providing a framework for investors, and addressing issues like low wages and rising food prices.

Foreign Policy Demands

In foreign policy, reformists call for reduced regional tensions, emphasizing diplomacy and cooperation with European and neighboring countries. On nuclear policy, they propose suspending uranium enrichment for sanctions relief and seeking ways to contain Iran’s nuclear program. They also seek greater integration into the international economy and global society, enhanced cooperation with the IAEA, and a shift towards economic pragmatism.

Iran’s reformist movement has been invigorated by several significant events and long-standing grievances:

Internal Factors

Popular dissatisfaction with the regime: Decades of clerical rule have fostered widespread discontent and fueled a desire for change among Iranians. Public sentiment has shifted against the ruling elite, with surveys indicating that the majority of Iranians no longer support the Islamic Republic as a system of governance and favor the separation of religion from politics.
“Woman, Life, Freedom” protests (2022-2023): The death of Mahsa Amini in the custody of the morality police in 2022 sparked nationwide protests that highlighted the public’s defiance against the regime’s repressive policies, including the compulsory hijab laws. The protests revealed a deep chasm between the state and society, and the regime’s inability to enforce its authority without resorting to harsh crackdowns.
Economic mismanagement and corruption: Decades of economic mismanagement, systemic corruption, and the crippling impact of international sanctions have severely damaged the Iranian economy. High inflation, youth unemployment, and widespread shortages have deepened public frustration and fueled demands for economic reform and accountability, according to RealClearDefense.
Erosion of electoral legitimacy: The tightly controlled elections and disqualification of reformist candidates have alienated many voters, leading to plummeting voter turnout and a growing sense of cynicism about the possibility of achieving change through the ballot box.
Intra-elite dynamics and potential for realignment: The post-war environment seems to have intensified internal disagreements among the ruling elite regarding the future direction of Iran. The growing alienation of some traditional supporters of the clerical establishment, including some senior clerics, due to economic hardship and perceived mismanagement, could create opportunities for reformists or a broader opposition movement to gain traction.

External and Regional Decelopments

Weakening of Iran’s proxy networks and military failures: The recent conflict with Israel and the subsequent setbacks for Iranian-backed groups like Hamas and Hezbollah have exposed the limitations of Tehran’s regional strategy and military capabilities. Israel’s deep strikes into Iranian territory, targeting nuclear and military sites, have highlighted Iran’s vulnerabilities and its inability to effectively counter Israeli aggression, further eroding the regime’s domestic and international credibility.
Zangezur Corridor and U.S. involvement: The U.S.-brokered peace deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan and U.S. control of the Zangezur Corridor have raised concerns in Tehran about potential encirclement and the loss of economic and geopolitical leverage in the South Caucasus. This development could trigger a rethinking of Iran’s foreign policy in the region.
Shift in regional geopolitics: The conflict has prompted Arab states to reassess their relationships with Iran and Israel, leading to increased efforts to develop stronger defense industries and potentially balance against Israel’s military might, according to the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS). This shift could further isolate Iran and limit its regional influence.

Catalytic Effect

These events, occurring in relatively rapid succession, have created a confluence of pressures that have empowered reformist voices within Iran to demand change. The perceived failures of the hardline approach, coupled with deep-seated domestic discontent and external pressures, have created a critical juncture where the regime’s long-term survival is increasingly being questioned. While the path forward remains uncertain, these recent events have clearly emboldened the reform movement and significantly intensified the internal struggle for Iran’s future.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, as the Supreme Leader of Iran, aligns with the Twelver Shia understanding of End Times eschatology, particularly the belief in the return of the Hidden Imam, Muhammad al-Mahdi.

Here’s a breakdown of his perspective based on available information:

The Return of the Mahdi: Khamenei strongly emphasizes the belief in the eventual return of the 12th Imam, who is believed to be in occultation (a divinely willed concealment) until a time of great upheaval and tyranny, after which he will reappear to establish justice and peace on Earth.
Signs of the End Times: Like other Twelver Shias, Khamenei recognizes various signs preceding the Mahdi’s return. These include the prevalence of evil, injustice, and moral degradation, the rise of figures like the Sufyani (an enemy of the Mahdi), and the emergence of Sayyid al-Hasani (an ally).
Building a Mahdavi Society: Khamenei stresses the importance of working towards building a “Mahdavi society” – one that strives to please and aid the Imam Mahdi by upholding Islamic values and seeking self-development and positive transformation within their communities.
Active Waiting: Rather than passively waiting, Khamenei encourages an “active waiting” that involves striving for a just and righteous society as a preparation for the Mahdi’s return.
Criticism of Western Influence: In this context, some of Khamenei’s pronouncements and actions – particularly his strong stance against Western powers, and criticism of the US and Israel – can be interpreted as fitting within a broader framework of resisting injustice and preparing for the ultimate victory of truth over falsehood, a key theme in End Times narratives.

What Does Khamenei Believe About the End Times?

In essence, Ayatollah Khamenei’s perspective on the End Times is rooted in Twelver Shia eschatology, centering on the return of the Mahdi to establish global justice and peace, and emphasizing the importance of actively striving for a righteous society as part of this awaiting.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of Iran, holds strong beliefs regarding the end times, particularly concerning the reappearance of the Hidden Imam, Imam Mahdi, in Twelver Shi’a Islam

Messianic Awaiting (Entezar): Khamenei views the waiting for Imam Mahdi’s return not as passive anticipation but as an active period of striving to build a society that is righteous and prepared for his reappearance – a “Mahdavi society.”

Imam Mahdi’s Role: He believes that Imam Mahdi, the prophesied redeemer of Islam, will eventually emerge and establish justice and peace globally, according to the Hudson Institute.
Israel’s Role: There is a strong belief articulated by Khamenei that Israel will not exist in the future, associating this timeframe with the ultimate victory of the Islamic resistance and the coming of the Mahdi, reports CNN.

The “Axis of Resistance” and its Role: Khamenei sees the “Axis of Resistance” – a coalition of groups aligned with Iran in the Middle East – as a crucial element in confronting perceived enemies like the United States and Israel, and ultimately, paving the way for the Mahdi’s reappearance.
Importance of Action and Preparation: Khamenei emphasizes that the waiting for the end times and Imam Mahdi’s return necessitates active efforts, self-development, and bringing about positive transformations in one’s environment to align it with the ideals of a Mahdavi society.
Combating “Enemies” Delaying the Mahdi’s Arrival: Some close to Khamenei, like Ali Saidi, have asserted that “liberal” and “secular” elements within Iran, along with external forces like the United States, are seen as delaying the Mahdi’s appearance, notes Al Arabiya English.

These beliefs are central to Khamenei’s ideology and worldview, influencing Iran’s domestic and foreign policies, particularly its approach to regional conflicts and relations with Western powers.

See COPYRIGHT information below.